Animal testing has also been instrumental in saving endangered species from extinction, including the black-footed ferret, the California condor and the tamarins of Brazil. If we truly want to improve our lives and the lives of others, we need to cut out the use of animals altogether. Treatments for animals developed using animal testing also include pacemakers for heart disease and remedies for glaucoma and hip dysplasia.
Animals Rights and Vivisection. The study accused the federally-funded labs of breeding mice to carry genes that "predispose them to crippling diseases and other maladies.
Show your support by choosing only to buy cruelty free products. Not a single mouse was adversely affected by the fluoride, but the rats experienced health problems like cancer of the mouth and bone.
Animals are also indispensable to the rapidly growing field of biotechnology, where they are used to develop, test, and make new products such as monoclonal antibodies. Nonhuman primates, for example, increased from 7, to 11, though the change was not statistically significant.
Peter Singer, Animal Liberation, Avon, Sadly, there are a number of examples where researchers have been prepared to experiment on human beings in ways that should not have been permitted on animals.
They can feel pain and experience pleasure. A primate experimented on. The proposals have three aims: The approximately million people in the United States keep about million dogs and cats as pets.
As with inbred mice, members of some animal species are genetically identical, enabling researchers to compare different procedures on identical animals. Are there any advantages in non-animal testing. However, we look upon past examples of this behavior as morally condemnable.
PETA has long campaigned for a reduction in animals used experiments and there has been a shift way from using them for such things as chemical toxicity testing and medical education.
Other animals used are hamsters, rabbits, guinea pigs, dogs, cats, nonhuman primates, frogs, sheep and cattle. Many people believe that animals are here for humans to use, and even if we have to sacrificeanimals in the hope of benefiting one person, then it is worth it.
Animals can be fed identical and closely monitored diets. It is not only drugs and vaccines. Drugs like thalidomide, Zomax and DES were all tested on animals and judged safe but had devastating consequences for the humans who used them. John P Gluck has suggested that this is often lacking: Yet it is still the best way of finding out what causes disease, and of knowing whether new treatments will be safe and effective.
Gluck; Ethics and Behavior, Vol. Indeed, given that problems exist because scientists must extrapolate from animal models to humans, one might think there are good scientific reasons for preferring human subjects. In the animal experiment context, if the experiment takes place, the experimenter will carry out actions that harm the animals involved.
In an article accompanying the study, Lisa Hara Levin of the animal welfare group Animal Care and Control of New York and William Reppy of Duke University said the study illustrated the need to reform policies related to animal research. This bleak result of deciding the morality of experimenting on animals on the basis of rights is probably why people always justify animal experiments on consequentialist grounds; by showing that the benefits to humanity justify the suffering of the animals involved.
Most people agree that animals have at least some moral status — that is why it is wrong to abuse pets or needlessly hurt other animals.
A monkey been used for product testing in his eyes to see if it works or not.
in my opinion i think that animal testing should be eliminated because it violates animals' rights. And its not okay to use animals for products just to make them safe for human.
We should treat animals good just like. Animal Testing: Should Animals be used in Research? Animal testing is the use of living animals for scientific or commercial testing.
According to my first source, an article found on allianceimmobilier39.com, called Animals Used in Research in the U.S., in Should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing?
Proponents of animal testing say that it has enabled the development of many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, that there is no alternative method for researching a complete living organism, and that strict regulations prevent the mistreatment of animals in laboratories.
The company tries to reduce the number of animals used in testing and replace animal tests where possible, Kushner wrote.
But computer-modeling programs, cell cultures and organs-on-chips cannot. Animals should not be used for testing since they deserve to do things they want to and not what humans want them to do.
Humans force many different animals to do things for our own desire. Animals need to live freely not in the cages they will need to live in during the testing.
Report Post. Debate whether or not animals should be used for testing.
Do you think it is a humane way of handling things?Should animals be used for testing